SAST Tool Selection — RFP Evaluation Matrix (Weighted Scoring)

Scope: Enterprise-grade SAST tools for regulated CI/CD environments Scoring scale: 1. Evaluation Categories & Weights Category Weight Governance & Policy Enforcement 20% CI/CD Integration & Automation 20% Detection Quality & Accuracy 15% Developer Experience 15% Auditability & Evidence 15% Scalability & Operations 10% Vendor & Strategic Fit 5% Total 100% 2. Detailed Scoring Table (Per … Read more

DORA Compliance Architecture: CI/CD as a Regulated ICT System

The Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) introduces a fundamental shift in how regulated organizations must design, operate, and govern their ICT systems. Under DORA, compliance is no longer limited to policies or periodic controls—it must be embedded directly into technical architectures and operational workflows. This article provides a conceptual and architectural explanation of how CI/CD … Read more

How Auditors Actually Review CI/CD Pipelines

CI/CD pipelines are increasingly in scope during security and regulatory audits. While many organizations focus on policies and tooling descriptions, auditors assess CI/CD pipelines very differently in practice. This guide explains how auditors really approach CI/CD reviews, what they look for first, how they test controls, and why many organizations fail audits despite having “secure” … Read more

DORA Article 21 — Evidence Pack for Auditors

What to Show, Where to Find It, and Why It Matters This evidence pack lists the technical and operational artifacts that financial institutions should present to demonstrate compliance with DORA Article 21.It focuses on CI/CD pipelines as regulated ICT systems and emphasizes reproducible, audit-ready evidence. How to Use This Evidence Pack Article 21(1) — ICT … Read more

DORA Article 21 — Auditor Checklist (CI/CD & ICT Risk Management)

This checklist is designed to assess compliance with DORA Article 21 requirements through CI/CD pipeline controls and supporting ICT processes.It supports internal audits, supervisory reviews, and regulatory assessments. Article 21(1) — ICT Risk Management Framework Control Check Yes No CI/CD pipelines are included in the ICT risk management scope ⬜ ⬜ ICT risks related to … Read more

DORA Article 21 ↔ CI/CD Controls Mapping

This table maps DORA Article 21 ICT risk management requirements to concrete CI/CD pipeline security controls.It supports regulatory interpretation, audit preparation, and technical implementation reviews. Article 21(1) — ICT Risk Management Framework DORA Requirement CI/CD Control Evidence Generated Identify and assess ICT risks Automated security testing (SAST, SCA, DAST) Scan reports, pipeline logs Prevent and … Read more

DORA Article 21 Deep Dive: Enforcing ICT Risk Controls via CI/CD

Article 21 of the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) defines the core ICT risk management requirements applicable to financial entities operating within the European Union. Unlike high-level governance obligations, Article 21 focuses on concrete technical and organizational controls that must be implemented, monitored, and evidenced continuously. This article provides a deep technical analysis of Article … Read more

CI/CD Security Audit — Compliance Mapping (ISO 27001 / SOC 2 / DORA)

This compliance-oriented audit table maps CI/CD security controls to common regulatory and assurance frameworks.It is intended to support internal audits, external assessments, and regulatory readiness in enterprise environments. 🔐 Identity & Access Management (IAM) Control ISO 27001 SOC 2 DORA Yes No Least privilege enforced for CI/CD service accounts A.8.2 / A.5.15 CC6.1 ICT Risk … Read more

CI/CD Security Audit — Compliance Mapping (NIS2 / PCI DSS)

This audit table maps CI/CD security controls to NIS2 Directive requirements and PCI DSS controls.It supports risk management, supply chain security, and audit readiness for critical and payment-related systems. 🔐 Identity & Access Management (IAM) Control NIS2 PCI DSS Yes No Least privilege enforced for CI/CD service accounts Art. 21(2)(b) Req. 7.2 ⬜ ⬜ Separation … Read more